<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Monks and Fixed Points</title>
	<atom:link href="http://unimodular.net/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=7" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://unimodular.net/blog/?p=7</link>
	<description>ecstatic over numbers</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 13:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: venkat</title>
		<link>http://unimodular.net/blog/?p=7#comment-3378</link>
		<dc:creator>venkat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2006 07:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unimodular.net/blog/?p=7#comment-3378</guid>
		<description>Nice to know the french-connection:
http://unimodular.net/blog/?p=86.

I was able to grasp the formalization as stated in Intermediate Value Theorem. I think whoever wrote the Wikipedia article on  "Continuous function" did a nice job in explaining the essence to a layman.

An excerpt from the article:

"If a child undergoes continuous growth from 1m to 1.5m between the ages of 2 years and 6 years, then, at some time between 2 years and 6 years of age, the child's height must have been 1.25m."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice to know the french-connection:<br />
<a href="http://unimodular.net/blog/?p=86" rel="nofollow">http://unimodular.net/blog/?p=86</a>.</p>
<p>I was able to grasp the formalization as stated in Intermediate Value Theorem. I think whoever wrote the Wikipedia article on  &#8220;Continuous function&#8221; did a nice job in explaining the essence to a layman.</p>
<p>An excerpt from the article:</p>
<p>&#8220;If a child undergoes continuous growth from 1m to 1.5m between the ages of 2 years and 6 years, then, at some time between 2 years and 6 years of age, the child&#8217;s height must have been 1.25m.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tpc</title>
		<link>http://unimodular.net/blog/?p=7#comment-3377</link>
		<dc:creator>tpc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 13:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unimodular.net/blog/?p=7#comment-3377</guid>
		<description>Dear Venkat,

The suggested solution is exactly what you described. But it seems that not everyone can think of things in this way. 

And of course, we being maths geeks, must always using scary things like intermediate value theorem. 

http://unimodular.net/blog/?p=86</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Venkat,</p>
<p>The suggested solution is exactly what you described. But it seems that not everyone can think of things in this way. </p>
<p>And of course, we being maths geeks, must always using scary things like intermediate value theorem. </p>
<p><a href="http://unimodular.net/blog/?p=86" rel="nofollow">http://unimodular.net/blog/?p=86</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: venkat</title>
		<link>http://unimodular.net/blog/?p=7#comment-3376</link>
		<dc:creator>venkat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 09:38:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unimodular.net/blog/?p=7#comment-3376</guid>
		<description>I am just wondering, cann't the proof for this problem be stated in english language like this:

Assuming the monk starts climbing up at 8:00 am and another monk (clone) starts descending down at 8:00 am the same-day, they are supposed to meet somewhere if it is the same route. So there should be a place on the mountain where both the monks meet. In other words, is this not a solution? Just curious.

Thanks
~Venkat</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am just wondering, cann&#8217;t the proof for this problem be stated in english language like this:</p>
<p>Assuming the monk starts climbing up at 8:00 am and another monk (clone) starts descending down at 8:00 am the same-day, they are supposed to meet somewhere if it is the same route. So there should be a place on the mountain where both the monks meet. In other words, is this not a solution? Just curious.</p>
<p>Thanks<br />
~Venkat</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://unimodular.net/blog/?p=7#comment-93</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2005 00:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unimodular.net/blog/?p=7#comment-93</guid>
		<description>What a practical application of the Intermediate Value Theorem! Assuming that you need to know that this might occur--- which, well, you probably wouldn't.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a practical application of the Intermediate Value Theorem! Assuming that you need to know that this might occur&#8212; which, well, you probably wouldn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://unimodular.net/blog/?p=7#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2004 14:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unimodular.net/blog/?p=7#comment-40</guid>
		<description>I agree, it's an excellent problem with a brilliant solution. It was published in New Scientist in the 60s so is at least 40 years old.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, it&#8217;s an excellent problem with a brilliant solution. It was published in New Scientist in the 60s so is at least 40 years old.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
